vBulletin

Thank you for visiting. This is our website archive. Please visit our main website by clicking the banner above.
vBulletin FAQ is dedicated to helping the forum owner build, manage and profit from his vBulletin Forum
vBulletin Web Hosting - Free skins and styles for your vBulletin - Search Engine Optimization




Q & A on PageRank

minstrel
10-03-2006, 08:33 AM
More info on PageRank (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-info-on-pagerank/)
October 2, 2006
by Matt Cutts

Every few months we update the PageRank data that we show in the toolbar, and every few months I see a few repeated questions, so let me take a pass at some of them. Note: I wrote this kinda quickly, so I think this is pretty good, but if I spot something incorrect later, I’ll change it.

Philipp Lenssen asks: “Matt, I often wonder, how is the PageRank value stored internally, is it a floating-point number as many people suggest or is it just the integer value itself due to the heavy recursive PR computations?”

It’s more accurate to think of it as a floating-point number. Certainly our internal PageRank computations have many more degrees of resolution than the 0-10 values shown in the toolbar.

viggen says: “Do i need to know that? What does it tell me when i know it? Why would i care? Meaning, what purpose has the Pagerank for the mom and pop site out there?”

viggen, I think that’s a perfectly healthy attitude. If you don’t care about PageRank and your site is doing well, that’s fine by me.

Andrew Hunter asks: “Will the data centers using the slightly older infrastructure be updated in due course, or will my PR be split by data center for the next couple of months?”

The latter. I think most data centers are running the newer infrastructure for things like info:, related:, link: and PageRank, and I believe every data center that has that newer infrastructure has the recent snapshot of PageRank now. I wouldn’t be surprised if it took at least 1-2 months for the other data center IPs to get the newer infrastructure in some way. (Yes, this is smaller, different infrastructure than the stuff that made site: queries have more accurate results estimates.)

Lots of folks ask questions like: “Is this PageRank from day X or day Y? And it looks like backlinks are from day Z?”

Really, I wouldn’t worry about it–I’m not even sure myself. At some point we take our internal PageRanks, put them on a 0-10 scale, and export them so that they’re visible to Google Toolbar users. If you’re splitting hairs about the exact date that backlinks were taken from, you’re probably suffering from “B.O.” (backlink obsession) and should stop and go do something else for a bit until the backlink obsession passes. I highly recommend keyword analysis, looking at server logs to figure out new content to add, thinking of new hooks to make your site attract more word-of-mouth buzz, pondering how to improve conversion once visitors land on your site, etc.

I’ll do a follow-up. Supplemental Challenged said: “The fact that Google can only create a PR update that is a full quarter behind the times is awfully troubling.”

I believe that I’ve said before that PageRank is computed continuously; there are machines that take inputs to the PageRank algorithm at Google and compute the resulting PageRanks. So at any given time, a url in Google’s system has up-to-date PageRank as a result of running the computation with the inputs to the algorithm. From time-to-time, that internal PageRank value is exported so that it’s visible to Google Toolbar users (see the question below for more details on the timing).

Matt Crouch asks: “Actually, I am just curious why you are bothering telling us about a new PR update…. is this the first time you ever did?”

Well asked, Matt Crouch; I’m not sure if I’ve given the official word on a PageRank export before. It’s not a big event here at Google. Frankly, I didn’t even know we’d done our 3-4 month-ish push of this data. When I saw people talking about it online, I went to check and see whether it was a real push or not. In the past few months, people have noticed when an engineer grabs an obscure data center and tinkers around with things like backlinks or info: queries (e.g. when “Update Pluto” got downgraded because it was just an engineer tinkering at one data center). So I figured I’d let people know that this was a real PageRank export and not just one person doing something.

New Jersey SEO asked: “Will this PR update affect SERPs? Are we going to have also a SERP data refresh / update?”

Great question. By the time you see newer PageRanks in the toolbar, those values have already been incorporated in how we score/rank our search results. So while you may be happy to see that the Google Toolbar shows a little more PageRank for a given page, it’s not as if that causes a change in search results at that point. So you won’t see any search engine result page (SERP) changes as a result of this PageRank export–those changes have been gradually baking in since the last PageRank export.

Hell³
10-03-2006, 12:04 PM
So you won’t see any search engine result page (SERP) changes as a result of this PageRank export–those changes have been gradually baking in since the last PageRank export.Really?, then I would like him to explain why my serps look like a snapshot of 3 months back results.

minstrel
10-03-2006, 06:28 PM
For a while, mine looked like July 2005.

minstrel
10-03-2006, 06:37 PM
Google is Broken
As sung by Cat Stevens
lyrics by minstrel

Google is broken, like the first engine
Matt Cutts has spoken, like the first nerd
Praise for blog groupies, praise for sycophants
Praise for the spinning fresh from Matt's pen

Hell³
10-03-2006, 06:47 PM
Hehehehe, I sense a hit.

beller
10-15-2006, 02:41 PM
heres a question on Pagerank?
mysite.com has a PR2 yet mysite.com/index.php has PR3
its the same page any reason for this?

minstrel
10-15-2006, 02:47 PM
Although this is one of the issues the Big Daddy update was supposed to fix, Google still sees http://www.mysite.com, http://mysite.com, http://www.mysite.com/index.php, and http://mysite.com/index.php as four different URLs.

Thus, the answer to your question is that you have more links pointing to mysite.com/index.php than to mysite.com.

dchapman
10-15-2006, 02:53 PM
Although this is one of the issues the Big Daddy update was supposed to fix, Google still sees http://www.mysite.com, http://mysite.com, http://www.mysite.com/index.php, and http://mysite.com/index.php as four different URLs.

That's something that has been confusing me for quite some time now. I was expecting to see like results on http://site and http://www so I didn't bother with my usual 301 redirects. I was not pleased to see that the appear to stil be counted as different pages. I've been out of the SEO scene for awhile now though, so maybe i've missed something.

beller
10-15-2006, 03:04 PM
I would have imagined that I have more inbound links on www.mysite.com (http://www.mysite.com) ...

minstrel
10-15-2006, 03:09 PM
Beller, don't forget that internal links count as well as external links and that not all links are equal - i.e., it's not just the quantity of incoming links but also the quality (PageRank of the orginating page, number of other outgoing links on the originating page, and relevance of that page to the URL it's pointing to).

dchapman, Google is supposed to be actively working on this but they're not doing a very good job so far in 2006 of fixing one issue without creating several more... it's pretty frustrating.

Dave A
10-15-2006, 03:24 PM
When I got set up on Google Webmaster tools, one of the settings there is which of the two (http://yourdomain vs http://www.yourdomain) you prefer. And there was some sort of message with it where I got the impression it now merged the results.

Could easily be wrong though. It was a couple of weeks ago...

minstrel
10-15-2006, 03:28 PM
They've been working on it since February. That option is, I believe, for how you want your Google Sitemaps to work. It would be nice if your selection actually influenced how the site is actually indexed but sadly to date I'm not seeing much evidence of that.

Lots of rhetoric about this and other Google issues but little more, in my opinion. Instead, we get Matt Cutts talking about International Pirate Day, his cat, and other riveting issues of interest only to himself, his immediate family, and the sycophants that frequent his blog comments. :rolleyes:

It's getting beyond irritating.


vBulletin

seo book

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum